“[Consumers] think they’re comparing apples to apples,” Forster said. “They think they’re getting a great deal. But it’s not the same thing.… If you went into a steak house and they said, ‘We’ve got the rib eye on sale for $10.’ [You say] ‘Wow, I’ll get the rib eye.’ And a few minutes later, your food comes out, and it’s a big hamburger.”
In response, Genesis owner Boaz Ramon told the show that even the same diamond lab sometimes produces varying results.
“Keep in mind, diamonds are subjective,” he told the program. “There is no argument when you take a diamond from a certain lab, and you send this same diamond to a different lab, you’ll get different results. But, in the end, its all reflected in the price for the consumer.”
Ramon later told JCK that his three-store chain will “make some changes,” including reducing the amount of EGL International reports it carries. But he says that 78 percent of its diamonds carry GIA reports.
“We are not here to promote one lab over another,” he says. “We all know most jewelers carry all reports. We are not doing anything different than any other jeweler.”
The second installment tracked an unhappy customer who, it claimed, “paid nearly $5,000 [for a diamond at Genesis] less than six months ago, but two trained gemologists have since told him it’s realistically worth around $1,200.”
After the engagement went sour, the man returned to the store to ask for a refund, claiming the diamond wasn’t the quality he thought. With the news team’s hidden cameras rolling, a store employee told him in response: “The problem is that, you see, there are two different grading systems. One is the EGL, and one is the GIA.”
Genesis declined to give him a full refund, since Ramon said once a ring is worn, he can’t sell it again.
“Most people, for them, getting engaged is something very pure,” he said. “They want to start it right. They don’t want to wear a ring that somebody said ‘no.'"
In the end, the customer was offered $2,500, plus a $500 trade-in credit.
Ramon tells JCK that the ring was custom made for that customer, and the store’s policy is to offer a full refund after 30 days and trade-in credit after that.
“The problem is, when someone tries to sell their diamond, it doesn’t matter if it’s from Tiffany or Harry Winston, the jeweler or pawnbroker will give you all the reasons the ring is not good, because they want to give you the lowest amount possible,” he says. “There is no industry where you buy something retail, and then you get retail back.”
He says he offered the consumer a generous deal, which he was happy with. “I don’t know any other jewelry store that will give him 65 percent back for his ring including the setting,” he says.
Ramon adds the store will now make its return policy clearer on its invoices.
Overall, he blamed the story on fellow jewelers.
“Since we came to Nashville, we have been always attacked by the competition,” he says. “Before us, you couldn’t find a store in Nashville that carried Tacori, Martin Flyer, Jeff Cooper. We brought all that to town. Do the competitors like it? They don’t. Do the customers like it? So far, so good.”
Reporter Demetria Kalodimos told JCK she got interested in the issue because of a customer complaint “and it grew from there.”
“I’ve had a lot of email and phone calls from customers wanting to know what to do,” she says, adding she recommends they get their stone appraised by a graduate gemologist.
At the end of the second segment, the news anchor says that the show has been contacted by the Tennessee attorney general’s office, which recommends consumers take any complaints to the state division of consumer affairs.
What retail company makes an item, lets you give that item to someone you love, that someone wears that item. (For who know how long she wore it cause the 4i-TEAM doesn't tell anyone that) Then the girl dumps the guy. He guy takes the item back for a 100% refund. The Answer is NO ONE! Another thing with this "report" is the "appraisal" or "unused replacement price" versus "retail price" versus "cost" price the store buys it at. Smart people know how retail works. This "report" seems very bias! I agree with the EGL lab report, any person buying anything should look up what they are buying before they buy anything. I googled EGL, I would have know not to buy it. That kid should have done the same.
This whole "report" sounds like set up by other jeweley stores.
Posted by: GoVols | May 12, 2014 at 10:53 PM